May 12th, 2009

The SCOTUS Nominee and The Tissue Box Test

I want to talk about tissues and the law and Supreme Court nominees. As the legal blogosphere and political Washington buzz about the judicial philosophy President Obama will be looking for in a judge to replace Justice David Souter — and what underrepresented social niche the nominee will come from, be it female, black, Hispanic, gay, etc. — what I want to know is if the nominee has ever had a box of tissues on his or her desk. For clients.

I want a nominee that knows what it’s like to have someone cry in their office. I want a nominee that has been there when someone tells them that their mother/father/brother/daughter was arrested/injured/killed and that they are desperate for help.

I want a nominee to know what it’s like to see real people — not political philosophies or corporate giants trying to add a few cents per share to their earnings — in their office in distress, and to represent them. I want a nominee that has experienced being the last, best hope for a downtrodden individual and the problem brought in the door. I want someone who knows what it’s like to be the underdog against corporate or government interests.

I want a nominee to know what it’s like to make the rent. To pay an employee. From their own pocket and not someone else’s. To answer the phones. To argue the case. To battle against deception. To actually practice law in the real world instead of in the ivory tower under the protective wings of others.

Our court is stuffed with Harvard and Yale law school grads, most of whom I think never actually tried a case for a private client, financed a case, or fought for an individual before ascending to the lofty heights of the appellate bench.

Last week Norm Pattis wrote on why we need a trial lawyer on the Supreme Court. He said:

A trial lawyer knows about raw human need and the law’s rough edges. It is a trial lawyer’s job to find the intersection of terror, fear and tears with the high doctrine and principle of the law. Not one member of the current court has ever sat with a client and his family during jury deliberations to discuss what will become of a family should the client be sent to prison.

We don’t have anything resembling a cross-section of society on the court. We don’t have people who look at broken bodies up front and personal in their offices. That’s why we have the tissue box. It isn’t to wipe our own noses.

At Simple Justice, Scott Greenfield picked up the Pattis theme with this about the birth of the trench lawyer movement:

In the trenches, we experience life, along with the huddled masses who care far less about whether a judge is a constructionist or originalist or texturalist. We know the consequences of decisions, together with the consequences of delayed decisions. Our view is ground level, and our understanding of how badly the law can hurt comes from holding the hands of the maimed. We know that people lie, cheat and steal, but we know that isn’t limited to the defendants. We have philosophies, but we live realities.

Perhaps life’s experience representing individuals will mean something different to the practitioner-judge than the philosopher-judge when the government strips away rights. Or corporations do a cost-benefit analysis and determine a few deaths aren’t so bad for their product because the profits will still exceed the legal payouts.

If Obama wants a judge who “understands that justice isn’t about some abstract legal theory or footnote in a casebook” then he better find a lawyer who once had that tissue box on the desk for the clients.
———————–

More:

Links to this post:

sotomayor–the perfect choice
barack obama needed four important qualities in his first supreme court nomination: first he needed to nominate a woman and/or a person of color; second, he needed to nominate someone who would not face confirmation problems, third,

posted by liberalamerican @ May 29, 2009 12:58 PM

the case for tissue-box lawyers
for reasons that should be fairly obvious, there’s quite a bit i disagree with in eric turkewitz’s impassioned defense (in the context of selecting potential judicial nominees) of injury and criminal-defense lawyers.
posted by Walter Olson @ May 12, 2009 7:53 PM

 

May 10th, 2009

Doctors Are Still Tops in Pay (But Complain About Malpractice Premiums Anyway)

Another year, another survey, and once again physicians are found to take home the biggest paydays in America. In fact, out of the ten top paying jobs, nine go to medical professionals.

It’s something to think about when doctors complain about malpractice premiums. Complaining about an expense is OK, but it is only relevant if the complainers also disclose their income. Saying an insurance premium is 20K means one thing if a person nets out 45K, but it means something else entirely when the person nets out 150K.

This is not to say that doctors don’t deserve the big paychecks. Some do, some don’t, it depends on the individual. And many doctors do carry extra debt from four years of medical school and low-wage residencies.

But if a medical professional is going to complain about an expense of working, they should nevertheless be prepared to also disclose their income. Because expenses have no context without knowing what it means in terms of income.

Links to this post:

doctors’ salaries and medical malpractice
forbes provides the top paying jobs in the united states. here are the top 5: 1. surgeons (>06770) 2. anesthesiologists (<97570) 3. orthodontists (<94930) 4. obstetrician and gynecologists (<92780) 5. oral and maxillofacial surgeons

posted by @ May 11, 2009 12:49 PM

doctors’ salaries and medical malpractice
forbes provides the top paying jobs in the united states. here are the top 5: 1. surgeons (>06770) 2. anesthesiologists (<97570) 3. orthodontists (<94930) 4. obstetrician and gynecologists (<92780) 5. oral and maxillofacial surgeons
posted by @ May 11, 2009 12:08 PM

 

May 8th, 2009

How Much Is That Mouse (Or Snake Head) In My Food Worth? — Updated

You see it every so often in the news, because the media just eats up these kinds of stories: The dead animal sitting in a plate of food at the restaurant. But the dead animal at the heart of the story is not supposed to be part of the food. This time it slithers into our view with a snake head that was found under broccoli at a TGI Fridays. Who knew that TGI Fridays even had broccoli? (h/t Overlawyered)

The story’s lede is this:

The sight of a severed snake’s head under his broccoli made Jack Pendleton lose interest in dessert. Pendleton said he found the head, the size of the end of his thumb, while eating Sunday at the T.G.I. Friday’s in Clifton Park. The chain restaurant said it regrets the appetite-killing error. Pendleton said he has no plans to sue.

I almost handled one of these myself a few years ago. A complaint came in to my office of a mouse that was baked into a hamburger bun. The bun, as seen in the picture here, had obviously not been eaten. But the site revolted the potential client and, to no great surprise, caused her nightmares and loss of appetite. She was a most unhappy camper.

Not being on trial at the time, and my curiosity piqued, I had her come in, took possession of the bag of buns, and sought out an expert to examine the critter. Who to call? I started with the Museum of Natural History, then tried the Bronx Zoo, a couple of vets, and after a dozen or so phone calls, found my way to a mouse lab at a leading cancer hospital. I had myself a bona fide mouse expert.

So I sent the goods off to my mouseologist for examination.

In the meantime, I ponder what, exactly, I am to do with this case? I sent out letters to potential defendants letting them know I represent the client. No demand of any kind, just a notification of representation since they already knew about the issue, and another to the NYS Department of Agriculture and Markets so that they could investigate.

Of course, that didn’t resolve the question of what, exactly, is a mouse (or a snake) in the food worth as compensation to an individual in such circumstances?

I queried some local counsel while scratching my head trying to decide what to make of this and while waiting for the expert to report back, appellate lawyer and wordsmith Jay Breakstone responded. With poetry:

A full mouse, I think,
Is not so distinct,
I seem to have seen,
One here in my sink.

But half a mouse, well,
That’s a mouse not so full,
Yet better than that,
It’s quite actionable.

A full mouse, I fear,
Is just not so rare,
Despite the view of,
A tail and some hair.

But half a mouse asks,
Where the other half is,
And that’s the mouse half,
Where a lawsuit might live.

And then my mouseologist got back to me with the results. She did this after taking photographs, cuts, and firing up the old x-ray machine to make sure. And as you can see from this last photo, it wasn’t a mouse. It’s a funny looking burn of the bread. The potential client, who had been sick to her stomach over this even though she hadn’t eaten any, was relieved. Letters immediately went out to those I’d previously contacted letting them know that the goods were good.

But the snake head at TGI Friday’s appears to be real, and so the question is clear: Where is the rest of the snake? Now this is not really an intellectual question for the customer who found it under his broccoli, because the response of getting sick to your stomach over something like this is a visceral reaction based on emotion.

In the article, the customer said he had no intention of hiring a lawyer. A perfectly logical first reaction for someone who would likely want to shake off the event and forget about it. As quickly as possible. But this is also part of the story:

When he started to eat his broccoli, he saw something gray on the plate he at first thought was a mushroom. “I start to turn it over. I see this gray-green patch,” he said.

Next he saw a V-shape that turned out to be the mouth of a snake. “I could see these black, rotted eye sockets on the top,” he said. The severed head also had bits of tendon and part of the spine attached, he said.

If the nightmares come and a loss of appetite ensues, that decision not to hire counsel could easily change. And that is because many traumas affect our intellects and our emotions in very different ways.
——————————–

Update: According to The Consumerist, which first broke the story, the snake head was not cooked with the broccoli, which seems to indicate something malevolent by either an employee or a customer.

Related: “Gross-Out” Food Stories – Cases We Do Not Take, But They Sure Catch Your Eye (Food Poison Blog)

 

May 8th, 2009

Linkworthy


100 Tweets: Thinking about law practice in 140 characters or less. (Matthew Homann @ the [non] billable hour)

Scott Greenfield takes on a “law blog” called USLaw that has been reprinting the entire content of other people’s blogs, including his, mine, and if you have a blog, probably yours. The comments pile up quickly in USLaw.com: The Verdict Is In.

In December I wrote about a Christmas sale stampede at Wal-Mart that resulted in the death of a temporary worker in Wal-Mart Liability in Stampede Death (Civil and Criminal). The criminal end has now been resolved with the payment of a fine, but no prosecution. Greenfield wonders why other criminal defendants can’t buy their way out of such jams.

China Law Blog tackles Blawg Review #210, ostensibly premised on discuss the 90th anniversary of the May 4th Movement that overthrew feudal China, but in reality, it is a guise to hand me a nomination for Justice Souter’s soon-to-be-vacant Supreme Court seat;

John Day on a report that is “a virtual treasure trove of information for lawyers handling slip and fall cases.

Texting while driving a bus? A big no-no. And this one is caught on tape.

TortsProf has this week’s Personal Injury Law Round-Up;

And finally, a lawyer joke I actually liked.

 

May 6th, 2009

Two Top NY Brain Surgeons Suspended For Abandoning Patient on OR Table

You don’t see this every day: Two top neurosurgeons at prestigious North Shore University Hospital were suspended for two weeks after abandoning a patient that had been prepped for brain surgery, had her head shaved, and been anesthetized.

According to New York’s Daily News, Thomas Milhorat, the hospital’s chief of neurosurgery, as well as his colleague, Paolo Bolognese, were suspended for two weeks starting April 17th after abandoning the patient on April 10th.

The paper reports that Milhorat earned $7.2 million in 2007 — the biggest surgeon salary in the New York area — and Bolognese made $2.4 million. (When doctors complain about the expense of malpractice premiums, their income is oddly omitted from the stories.)

The suspension conduct is remarkable because the medical community has a long history of covering up malfeasance. I’ve written before about the White Coat of Silence that prevents this type of information from coming out. (See also: How Medical Malpractice Gets Covered Up, and “They killed my patient. Then they tried to hide it.”)

But, as I’ve also noted a number of times, there are now appearing to be cracks in the knee-jerk philosophy of covering up, as shown in A Tale of Two Hospitals: One Covers-Up and One Apologizes.

Whether these anecdotes turn out to be part of a trend, or aberrations, we will know only with the passage of time.