August 22nd, 2008

Linkworthy

Justinian Lane at TortDeform has has been doing Inter Alia, a round-up of tort “reform” stories on the web. Certainly a valuable resource. (And he links this week to, inter alia, a tort “reforming” Chamber of Commerce that has brought it’s own lawsuit;

Walter Olson provides the flip side of Lane with his round-up from the conservative side, focusing on toxic cases at Point of Law;

Bill Childs has put this week’s Personal Injury Law Round-Up up at TortsProf with a link to, inter alia, the Big Foot hoax and subsequent lawsuit;

An Olympian Blawg Review is up at Chicago IP Litigation Blog;

And those four links provide a little round up of round-ups, and enough reading material for a week.

P.S. I usually stay out of presidential politics — because once you get started you can’t stop — but before the primaries I made these predictions: McCain/Romney and Obama/Biden: Presidential Politics and the Iowa Caucus

 

August 22nd, 2008

Graves Amedment Upheld by 11th Circuit


The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld the Graves Amendment. That 2005 law protects car rental and leasing companies from claims of vicarious liability for injuries caused by their drivers.

The decision comes out of three consolidated suits in Florida, which had allowed (like New York) the injured to sue the owners of the cars, in addition to the drivers. The owners were held to be strictly liable for the conduct of the drivers if the drivers were negligent. This was a public policy choice made by the legislators of some states, since the owners, by being able to exercise some control over who drove their cars, were more culpable than the innocent victims.

But in 2005 a Republican congress decided to strip this power to control their own insurance laws away from the states, and preempted them by giving it to the federal government in the form of protection for the rental and leasing companies. (I wrote about my own rush to beat that law just days ago in The Million Dollar Listserv.) The hypocritical conduct by the Republicans in usurping state authority for the benefit of these corporations has been widely derided.

While insurance laws are strictly state matters, the court held the statute constitutional under the Commerce Clause, due to the use and impact on rented and leased cars across state lines.

Given the current business friendly make up of the Supreme Court, I doubt that an appeal to that court would be successful unless other Circuits divide the issue. This is, to my knowledge, the first federal appellate decision on the law.

See also my post from last September from one of the lower court decisions: Car Rental Immunity Law Held Unconstitutional By Federal Judge.

 

August 18th, 2008

The Million Dollar Listserv (Updated)

The listserv may be the single greatest tool the solo or small practice lawyer has. And this post explains why.

This is also a story about some of the best lawyering I ever did, and its connection to a listserv. While I suspect that the lesson may be old hat to many readers — since you are obviously already connected or you wouldn’t have found this blog — I’m going to spill forth anyway on the odd chance you do not already belong to a listserv, or that this gets passed by a friend to at least one less-than-connected attorney.

The story involves the case I just blogged about in June that went to verdict. But if you think I’m going to brag about a brilliant legal argument or devastating cross-examination tip that I picked up and used, don’t worry. It isn’t about that.

Rather, it’s about how a good listserv can spill forth a spectacular amount of small nuggets of information, any one of which can help turn a case. In the one I just tried, I had been alerted to an imminent change in the law. That change turned a 100K case into a seven figure case.

By way of background to appreciate this, you have to know that the car accident that injured my client occurred in July 2005, and that the car that did the damage was a leased vehicle. The Graves Amendment was then passed by Congress just three weeks after the accident. And that amendment destroyed the vicarious liability that existed in New York that held leasing companies responsible when their drivers caused accidents.

Within days of being retained by my client, and while she was still institutionalized in rehab, I learned through a listserv that a House-Senate conference had agreed to this amendment that would eviscerate her rights to recover for her injuries. I learned of the legislation just one day before I was to go on vacation, and I had no idea when President Bush would sign it. So I typed up a Complaint at home and rushed it into the courthouse the next day for filing, beating the presidential signature.

I’d like to tell you the best lawyering I ever did had something to do with one of my trials with fancy openings or summations, a great bit of research finding an obscure case or a brilliant legal argument. Or perhaps a story of an argument from the Second Circuit or New York’s First or Second Appellate Departments.

But instead, the blunt reality is that the simple participation in a listserv alerted me to the passage of damaging legislation. Being connected kept me up to date. Being connected got my client to the courthouse door in time. There was another person injured in this accident, by the way, and his lawyer didn’t file in time. I never asked, but I think it is safe to assume he was not connected to people who were discussing the latest of legal events.

So the utterly simple and routine act of typing up a standard personal injury complaint and getting it filed right away turned out to be one of the best things I’ve ever done for a client. Without it she would have been stuck with the insurance policy limits of the two cars involved, 25K and 100K. Instead, she was able to proceed against the owner/lessor for injuries that clearly exceeded those minimal policies, for an ultimate recovery that exceeds those numbers by seven figures.

And so if you are not connected to such a group in your geographic area, or at least your practice area, then find one. Or create one. This is all the more important for the legions of solo and small firm practitioners, giving you not only the opportunity to swap the latest in news, but the latest in court rules, judicial temperaments and local gossip that just might one day mean all the world to your client.

The constitutionality of the amendment, by the way, is currently on appeal.

Update: Just one day after posting this, the Graves Amedment Was Upheld by the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals

 

August 17th, 2008

Linkworthy


The Personal Injury Law Round-Up is up at TortsProf, this week by Christopher Robinette. So folks like me that have been out of the loop for a week now have an easy way to play catch up;

FindLaw gets busted trying to game the Google rankings by selling links for $12,000 per year. They had a Pagerank of 7. Now they have a 5. Will they be sued if they don’t refund the money? (Kevin O’Keefe @ Real Lawyers Have Blogs and Oilman);

And whether one agrees with Justice Scalia’s politics or not, there is one thing almost every agrees on: That guy can write. Lisa Solomon attended a talk of his on the subject, Scalia’s Remarks About Legal Writing. Solomon also has a picture of herself with the Justice at her site.

 

August 8th, 2008

Linkworthy

Sometimes the comments can be great. If only you find them. So here you go….After I posted about my tort “reform” op-ed in a local paper serving the million or so people in the commuter counties north of NYC, Ted Frank came in with a minor correction at Overlawyered. Then deep into the comments, a long discussion/debate on medical malpractice and academic studies broke out between Frank and Professor Richard Wright. So check out the terrific discussion starting at comment 16.

Blawg Review #171 is like a virgin. Why? If I told you, you wouldn’t go to the link.

TortsProf Sheila Scheuerman takes her first swing at the Personal Injury Law Round-Up, and knocks the ball out of the park with a broad array of links.

Max Kennerly takes on an anti-class action piece in the WSJ regarding the constitutionality of cy pres distributions by George Krueger and Judd Serotta, picking apart some bad legal arguments that he sees.

And a giant table computer from Microsoft that has nothing whatsoever to do with personal injury law. But the commercial is funny as hell.