October 26th, 2007

Personal Injury Law Round-Up #34

The New York Personal Injury Law Blog brings you the week that was:

Let’s start with some pre-litigation issues:

The New York Medical Examiner, under the leadership of long time Chief Charles Hirsch, has rejected the September 11 attack as a cause of death for a 34 year-old retired cop that worked long hours on the pile. There is no lawsuit here, just parents that wants their son recognized as victim of the attack;

Dainius A. Drukteinis (M.D. and J.D.) discussed the legal issues presented when a consultant refuses the request of the ER doc, at NY Emergency Medicine;

Tort “reform” took center state at a Republican presidential debate. Overlawyered’s Walter Olson explains how Rudy Giuliani and Fred Thompson squared off against each other;

And since we’re on the subject, tort “reformers” like to blame lawyers for “defensive medicine” that increases health care costs, and sometimes the media picks up their talking points. But as Grunt Doc explains after Kevin, M.D. appears on a CBS Evening News report, there is often a reason for that “defensive” procedure;

Ed Van Dorn discusses what happened in New Hampshire after the state instituted a medical malpractice screening system. Did it result in an efficient, time and cost saving method of disposing of claims as tort “reformers” argued would happen? Or did it cause delay, delay, delay (as perhaps, they privately hoped);

Florida dismisses a case against a pharmacy from the family of a teen that OD’d on Oxycontin he got from his college roommate. The drugs had been stolen by a friend of the roommate, and the pharmacy had less than adequate security (via Overlawyered);

Beck/Herrmann discuss a law review article by TortsProf Bill Childs, and broach the subject of litigation driven scholarship. Bill adds some more thoughts at his own place;

Judge Richard Posner tackles Should Hosts Be Liable for Serving Liquor to Guests Who Cause Accidents While Driving under the Influence? The response comes from his co-blogger, Prof. Gary Becker;

Cardiologist Dr. Wes has some thoughts on a recall by heart defibrillator maker Medtronics, due to concerns the lead may tear inside the body: As the advertising by attorneys heats up:

The Newark Star-Ledger has a piece on one of my pet issues: Fake medicine, real problem (via Pharmalot). Why is it a pet issue? Y0u can read the counterfeit drug resource page at my firm’s website or click on counterfeit drugs in the sidebar here;

From today’s New York Daily News:

A bogus Brooklyn dentist dumped a 71-year-old woman onto the curb like garbage after she began foaming at the mouth and lost consciousness in his chair, police said Thursday.

Zagat’s is now rating doctors. Can attorneys be far behind?

And in to litigation we go:

From the Celebrity Lawsuit Department: Tennessee Titans Pacman Jones has been sued for a shooting outside Vegas strip club, according to John Day; Is a Kid Rock lawsuit far behind?

Tainted food guru Bill Marler is no doubt exceptionally busy these days with the outbreaks of eColi. But that doesn’t stop him from blogging, in this case regarding the New York Times article on the problems at Topps;

Medical malpractice suits against cruise lines are getting tossed out with some regularity, according to the Wall Street Journal, based on assertions that the cruise ship doctor is not a crew member, but an independent contractor. And since the doctor is not usually American and the malpractice occurred on the high seas, they must be sued in their own country, and often can’t be found leaving the victim without any recourse (W$J, ABA Journal synopsis);

Award winning blogger Matt Lerner at New York Civil Law examines the liability issues of a common carrier in New York, as New York’s high court rules on the subject;

The Maryland high court tossed out a case by a powerlifter that was injured trying to hoist 530 pounds. At issue, Ronald Miller explains, was the relationship between the concept of assumption of risk for sporting activities, and the allegations that the spotters were negligently trained;

A $30M medical malpractice case was tossed out by a 5-1 majority of the Ohio Supreme Court, due to the conduct of “famously obnoxious” attorney Geoffrey Fieger (via TortsProf);

Ted Frank at Point of Law has a piece on jurors in long trials v. short trials. While his synopsis of a recent study probably won’t come as too much of a surprise, it is worth the look;

Settlements are often tricky in personal injury cases, as it is not easy to place a value on an individual’s pain and suffering. A new service, according to Ron Miller and Evan Schaeffer, tries to assist.

And finally:

(Eric Turkewitz is a personal injury attorney in New York)

 

October 26th, 2007

More SoCal Attorneys Offering Up Free Legal Services

Yesterday California attorney Jonathan Stein offered free legal services to southern California fire victims. Today Stein says there are more:

Among the groups offering support are members of AAJ, CAOC, Consumer Attorneys of San Diego, Consumer Attorneys Association of Los Angeles, and United Policyholders, a non-profit group that helps insurance consumers.

His site has the details.

Links to this post:

check out…
…eric turkewitz’s new york personal injury law blog coverage of the growing number of attorneys and legal groups out in california that are offering to extend free legal services to fire victims. read about it here.
posted by Kia Franklin @ October 26, 2007 4:14 PM

 

October 24th, 2007

California Attorney Offers Free Help to Fire Victims

Jonathan G. Stein, a personal injury attorney with an office in Elk Grove, California, has offered free help to victims of the San Diego fires now ravaging the area.

In a blog posting earlier today, Stein said:

As much as we would all like to help, most of us are not trained in fire suppression. So, I am going to make an offer to the residents of San Diego: if you are a fire victim and you are not getting a response from your insurance company or they are low-balling you, call me. I will help you pro bono. (Yes, that means free.) Heck, if you just have a question and need a quick answer, call me or email me. I hope my fellow attorneys will step up to the plate as well.

J. Craig Williams at May It Please the Court discusses the dangers to his own home, and how media helicopters are interfering with firefighting efforts.

Update: Insurance Tactics and San Diego Fire Victims (Tort Burger – Hold the Reform)

 

October 23rd, 2007

Avis Tells Me Cease And Desist on Use Of Its Logo

Was my use of the Avis logo last month a violation of its trademark? I need to know because Avis hit me today with a cease and desist demand, asking that its logo be taken down from the old post.

The particular logo at issue, reproduced here at the right so you know what I’m discussing, was placed in my September 17 posting regarding a federal court decision: Car Rental Immunity Law Held Unconstitutional By Federal Judge. The law at issue had been the subject, I believe, of intense lobbying by the major car rental and leasing companies who had succeeded in getting immunity from vicarious liability slipped into a massive transportation bill at an early morning House-Senate conference. So when it was ruled unconstitutional, I thought that using the logos of Avis and Hertz was fair use in the context of the discussion.

Not so, says Fred Grumman, Associate General Counsel at Avis Budget Group, Inc. In a comment he left online earlier today regarding the logo, he wrote:

We have the greatest respect for your right to express your opinions on your blog, but that does not include the right to use Avis’ trademark as you have done in this particular piece.

Understandably, trademark law is not within your area of expertise. Therefore, we trust that this was done out of ignorance and not based on an intent to misuse our mark to the benefit of your personal injury practice.

We ask that you remove it immediately and refrain from any similar use in the future.

Now I will concede I am not the world’s greatest expert on trademark law, but it seemed perfectly fair to use in the context of major car rental companies lobbying for a law that was tossed out and is now headed to a federal appeals court. And I didn’t see how my use of the logo would cause confusion in the marketplace since I don’t rent or lease cars to anyone. While it is true some attorneys may have sidelines, like perhaps hair replacement, I most assuredly am not in the car business.

And so this post is an opportunity to seek some friends to help me grapple with the issue. Since my blog is not the only one that needs to wrestle with intellectual property issues and where lines get drawn, it seems ripe for public discussion. I am hopeful that someone, perhaps from this list (or elsewhere), might have a few opinions on the subject:

(Eric Turkewitz is most definitely not in the car rental business.)

Update, 10/29/07: Dear Avis (A Public Response To Your Trademark Complaint On My Blog)

Links to this post:

eric turkewitz of new york personal injury law blog [lexblog q & a]
eric turkewitz, the new york attorney and founder of the turkewitz law firm, is the featured interview subject for today’s lexblog q & a. aside from his legal work, eric also runs a blog, the new york personal injury law blog,

posted by [email protected] (Rob La Gatta) @ February 21, 2008 2:49 PM

eric turkewitz of new york personal injury law blog [lexblog q & a]
eric turkewitz, the new york attorney and founder of the turkewitz law firm, is the featured interview subject for today’s lexblog q & a. aside from his legal work, eric also runs a blog, the new york personal injury law blog,

posted by [email protected] (Rob La Gatta) @ February 21, 2008 2:49 PM

Blogging is Not Defamation
There is an interesting post over at the Kentucky Law Review blog. Interesting to bloggers that is. Turns out the court has looked at trademarks and bloggers but very few suits have been filed against bloggers.

posted by The Principal @ October 31, 2007 7:16 PM

ding dong – avis calling
it’s turning out to be a bit of an ip week… bill mcgeveran reports on avis, the car hire people, and their utterly unreasonable legal letters to blogger eric turkewitz (of the ny personal injury blog, mentioned in my blawg review

posted by Daithí @ October 30, 2007 1:22 PM

avis contests law blogger’s fair use of logo
last month, law blogger eric turkewitz of the new york personal injury law blog published this post about a judicial decision overturning a federal statute that’s relevant to liability of rental car companies.

posted by William McGeveran @ October 29, 2007 2:07 PM

berkman@10 in tech…nicolor
berkman alum william mcgeveran blogged about logos today over at info/law, the blog he shares with derek bambauer and tim armstrong, also berkman alums. and with perfect timing, bill has queued us up to display the new berkman@10 logo!

posted by @ October 29, 2007 9:38 AM

Avis tries harder…
but to do what is not entirely clear. As I picked up from the Trademark Blog, it appears that a lawyer representing Avis has told a legal blogger that he has no “right to use Avis’ trademark as [he did] in this particular piece.

posted by Rebecca Tushnet @ October 28, 2007 8:12 PM

avis contests law blogger’s use of avis logo in law blog article
in september, the new york personal injury blog reported on a court decision in which a federal judge held that a 2005 federal law that abolished vicarious liability for car renting and leasing companies. it illustrated the article with

posted by Marty @ October 28, 2007 1:34 PM

is this infringement?
read this and come back to post your opinion:
posted by marcorandazza @ October 24, 2007 1:17 PM