November 21st, 2007

Some Good Practice Tips

An article that appears today in Legal Times by Stewart Weltman (via Law.com) is chock full of good practice tips. I’d like to highlight two. Since the article’s vantage point is what defense lawyers can learn from plaintiff’s lawyers, it is equally good reading for both sides.

1. [T]he most direct route to obtaining a favorable settlement is to ignore the prospect of settlement and instead prepare from the outset as if your case is going to be tried.

Since I come from the world of medical malpractice, I know that very few cases settle early (see: No, your medical malpractice case will NOT settle fast). If settlement occurs it is often only after a trial has started. And the defendant can see if you are truly ready or not. So my training was always to prepare for trial, because any other type of lawyering was too risky. If I ignored the possibility of settlement and was ready for verdict, I could negotiate from strength if the other side starts to talk about resolutions. Conversely, if you aren’t really ready, you panic and may be forced to take the inadequate offer.

2. Many top plaintiffs lawyers will jump-start this process from the outset by articulating out loud a short statement of their best case in a minute or so to see how it sounds, perhaps running it past their assistant, paralegal, associates, or co-counsel. It is a simple yet powerful process that can and should be used in defense matters.

Actually, a minute is too long. Your case should be boiled down to a single sentence, particularly in the personal injury field. When the judge asks what the case is about — and yours is one of hundreds she is handling — she will want the nutshell version. If you don’t know it, you don’t truly know your case. It should look something like this:
“Failure to biopsy a hard nodule in the breast of a 54 year old woman leading to 10-month delay in diagnosis, with bilateral mastectomy and metastasis, instead of lumpectomy.” If judges want and need more details, they will ask. More importantly, the issues have been isolated.

The article is a great little primer on keeping the focus for defense lawyers and keeping costs down by following our methods.

 

November 1st, 2007

A $25M MRSA Claim in New York

The family of a 12 year-old New Yorker has filed a Notice of Claim (notice of an intention to sue) against the City of New York for releasing an MRSA infected boy from the emergency room of Kings County Hospital, a city hospital (via ATL). The child later died.

The big-number headline, a demand for $25M, reveals a quirk in New York law. While a claimant is forbidden from making a demand for damages in a Complaint that starts a suit (see: New York Cleans Up Claims Act), one is required to put a demand in the pre-suit Notice of Claim against the City of New York (or the Health and Hospitals Corporation that actually runs the city hospitals).

The amount claimed, by the way, is well in excess of any amount the courts of New York would uphold, even if a jury awarded it (see: How New York Caps Personal Injury Damages). While the amount claimed in such a notice might be a ceiling for a recovery, and thus provide an incentive to use the highest legally sustainable amount, the amount here is utterly ridiculous under New York law. The claim will be limited to the pain and suffering of the child and the pecuniary loss of the parents due to the child’s wrongful death (assuming liability is established). That actual pecuniary loss will be, by definition, limited due to the fact the child was 12.

New York law does not, sadly, allow compensation for parental grief (see, The September 11th Lawsuits And The Problem Of Compensable Grief in NY). In that regard, we are in the dark ages as most states now allow it.

(Eric Turkewitz is a personal injury attorney in New York)

 

October 23rd, 2007

So How Did You Find Your Attorney? SueEasy!!!

A new legal website is in the making called SueEasy. It apparently hasn’t gone live yet, but let me be the first in the legal blogosphere to shred the idea as incredibly stupid. And further, that any attorney that participates for a personal injury case may be committing legal malpractice.

The story comes via Peter Lattman at the WSJ Law Blog a few days ago who got it from TechCrunch.

The website urges people to contact them with their complaints and post their confidential legal papers, and then attorneys they have never met, spoken with or vetted, will bid for their business and the winner will get the case.

Just think of the trial testimony, regarding conduct that takes place before any attorney-client privilege is created:

Defense Counsel: How did you find your counsel?
Client: I used a website called SueEasy.
Defense Counsel: What is that?
Client: I submit information to a website and lawyers bid for my case.
Defense Counsel: Lawyers you’ve never spoken with?
Client: Yes.
Defense Counsel: So your lawyer bid for your case before ever speaking with you?
Client: Yup.
Defense Counsel: Based on information you submitted before s/he was retained?
Client: Yup
Defense Counsel: And xyz wasn’t in the packet of information you sent in to SueEasy, was it?
Client: No.
Defense Counsel: So your lawyer was asking for this case without even knowing about xyz?
Client: Yes.

This kind of crap, presented ever so briefly here, can easily go on for a half-hour or more, all about how the client used some anonymous website — that pitches how easy it is to sue a company or person — provided limited information, and found an attorney willing to bid on the case on that basis.

If one is looking to distract from the merits of a personal injury case and help drive a nail into its coffin, then using such a website is a great idea.

According to TechCrunch:

The site is kind of a reverse directory for lawyers that’s sure to be a haven for personal injury lawsuits.

The biggest beneficiaries will no doubt be defense lawyers and insurance companies who will have a field day with anyone caught using such a system. Any case that is close on the merits is surely likely to suffer from any halfway decent cross examination.

And I think that any practitioner that uses it should make sure their professional liability premiums are fully paid up. While the client may not know better, the attorney should.

Addendum, 10/24/07:

(Eric Turkewitz is a personal injury attorney in New York)

Links to this post:

is sueeasy the worst lawyer idea ever?
cross posted from new york personal injury law blog: when i first heard about sueeasy, i thought it was an april fool’s joke. but it was october when it first appeared as a development concept (see 10/23/07 post: so how did you find

posted by Eric Turkewitz @ April 18, 2008 9:38 AM

october 25 roundup
lawyer for mothers against drunk driving: better not call yourself mothers against anything else without our say-so [phoenix new times]. ohio insurer agrees to refund $51 million in premiums, but it’s a mutual, so money’s more or less
posted by @ October 25, 2007 1:07 AM

 

October 15th, 2007

How To Kill A Student: A Lesson From A Queens High School

This is how bureaucracy can kill a person.

At a high school in Queens, New York a memo went out to staff that in the event of an emergency, 911 should not be called. Because calling 911 in an emergency was apparently too easy. It wouldn’t allow the Powers That Be to be in the middle of the emergency. So instead, according to this Daily News story, the staffer should do these four things:

  1. Emergencies must be reported to the school’s nurse, an assistant principal and the principal.
  2. The child’s parents must be notified. If the parents can’t be reached, the nurse can decide whether to call an ambulance.
  3. If no one is in the nurse’s office, educators should report the matter to the nearest assistant principal and the principal.
  4. And if they aren’t available, the deans’ office should be charged with obtaining the medical care.

Of course, if it’s an emergency, by this point there’s a good chance it’s too late. I can’t even begin to fathom what kind of bureaucrat would create such a dumb memo, but clearly they need to be canned for the safety of, well, everyone else. Even more incredibly, this policy was implemented October 1st at a Jamaica high school that had seen a 14 year old have a stroke earlier this year in April, and wait an hour before treatment.

This policy was reminiscent of an incident a few years ago while I was in Atlantic City. A patron collapsed on the casino floor. One of my brothers, who is a physician, knelt down to help. After a quick evaluation he looked up to the security guard standing nearby and told him to call an ambulance. So what did the guard do? He said, “Let me call my supervisor.”

At that point my brother, with Warner Brothers cartoon character logo firmly emblazoned on his ball cap,looked at the guard and barked, “No. You will call 911 NOW. You can tell your supervisor later.” It didn’t take the guard long to understand the folly of the administrative procedures from the guy with the funny hat.

Sometimes negligence is a single event, like a red light that is run while a driver is in a hurry. And sometimes the negligence is institutionalized.

(Eric Turkewitz is a personal injury attorney in New York)

 

October 14th, 2007

Turkewitz On Front Page of Sports Section

It’s not every day I land on the front page of the local sports section, above the fold no less. But I think the story fits in with personal injury law given the countless ways people get hurt, so I want to discuss it. (Runners’ safety a high priority as days grow shorter.)

It’s about safety, personal responsibility and assumption of risk. It is, in essence, about risk management. In this case, the risks are tripping over the unseen or being hit by a car when running in the dark. And the management part revolves around lights and reflective clothes. And fashion be damned.

The theme of personal responsibility is one I often use at trial. Defense lawyers like it too. So in picking the cases to take, it’s a crucial parts of the analysis, regardless of whether it is a simple trip and fall on a broken sidewalk or a complex medical malpractice case. A jury wants to know what each of the parties did to prevent the incident that led to the injuries.

Oftentimes there is no clear cut answer, but a long sliding scale of grays. For example, a fall over a busted up portion of sidewalk may mean one thing to a juror if it occurred to a healthy 25 year old in clear weather in broad daylight (the failure to see that which is open and obvious) and something completely different if it’s a senior citizen walking the same sidewalk at dusk in the rain. In either case a juror will want to know what the injured person did to keep themselves safe as they measure the liability of the owner of the land.

And yet, cases land in the courts all the time where it seems as if the plaintiff’s attorney simply ignored substantial culpable conduct from his client. I can’t imagine it is the more experienced attorneys that are accepting such cases. It’s important to tread warily on matters where there may be a large degree of comparative fault.

There is also another lesson in this. The gut reaction of most defense attorneys, I think, would be to kick me off a jury panel in a civil case once they learned what I do for a living. But after reading the above, do you think they would be making a mistake in doing so?

Returning to the article, here is the money quote from yours truly for those too lazy to read the story:

“The headlamp is a great device to see and be seen – no matter how dorky it looks.”

(Eric Turkewitz is a personal injury attorney in New York)