Category Archives: Blogging

 

March 15th, 2007

Anonymous New York Blogger To Be Sued For Defamation

From today’s New York Sun:

An Orthodox Jewish blogger is asking a judge to protect her anonymity from a Long Island elected official who has gone to court to identity the blogger.

The elected official, Pamela Greenbaum, a member of the school board for Lawrence, L.I., asked a state judge last month to force Google to identify the writer behind a popular Web log for the orthodox community in the Five Towns area.

The blog, orthomom.blogspot.com, featured a posting in January critical of Ms. Greenbaum’s position regarding the use by yeshiva students of public school facilities. In guest comments to the postings, Ms. Greenbaum has been called a “bigot.” [link via Judicial Reports]

This seems to be a suit that goes nowhere, if being called a “bigot” is the sole issue, since that seems to be an opinion. Additional facts were not available at the New York Sun site (but are at links below).

It is worth pointing out here that anonymous speech is well protected under the First Amendment in accordance with the Supreme Court’s ruling in McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission. The country has a long history of anonymous speech in the form of books and pamphlets, including the Federalist Papers first published as “Publius.” Check out footnotes 4 and 6 of the Stevens majority opinion for some anonymous writings later attributed to historic figures.

Additional links:

 

January 17th, 2007

Reflections on Two Months as a Blogger….

While New York personal injury law is what I want my tiny corner of cyberspace to be about, and not bloggers and the blogosphere, I step back today to reflect on the two months since I started on November 17, 2006.

First, I want to thank those who assisted in private emails and with links placed at their sites, particularly those legal blogs in New York. That certainly helped me get started.

I’m pleased that links were provided not just as part of a long blogroll, but to the content. Nicole Black, the queen of New York legal bloggers residing over at Sui Generis, has now linked to several of my entries, and has provided wonderful reading on all things New York.

Cyrus Dugger over at Tort Deform and Corp Reform has cross-posted my comments on issues of national importance concerning the attack on our civil justice system by large corporate interests that seek various levels of immunity for negligent conduct. This includes my comments on Gov. Eliot Spitzer’s attempt to reform New York courts, the ruling that an Oklahoma court “reform” law was unconstitutional, and other matters. Author Stephanie Mencimer over at The Tortellini writes on a similar subject and has also passed a nod or two my way.

The Blawg Review, perhaps the most widely read of all legal blog compilations on the web, has now included me in two issues, the first of which was #89 regarding my note on a federal judge preventing the use of a pseudonym in a sex assault case. In issue #91, two different posts on emotional injuries were noted: The first on the tax exempt status of emotional injury compensation, and the one on zone of danger emotional injuries.

The Health Wonk Review picked up a bit I wrote regarding counterfeit drugs, as did the Health Business Blog by David Williams. I’m particularly grateful for these, as I assume many in health care have more than a bit of skepticism about personal injury attorneys. Also in the health field, Juvan’s Health Law Update has been a great source of information to me on the continuing issue of the Prescription Drug Marketing Act and recent legal maneuvers that have stalled its implementation. (And the recent redesign of the site is simply superb.)

Finally, the Health Business Blog hosted the Cavalcade of Risk blog carnival this week, and noted the post I put up on Geico’s idiotic idea to put up “safety” billboards at the George Washington toll booth plaza. Even a caveman would know it isn’t safe to distract drivers in such a location with needless billboards.

I’m delighted (and flattered) that different communities of bloggers (New York-centric, tort “reform” and health care policy) have included my comments in their postings.

I’m now getting at least two dozen different feeds from various blogs (including all those in my blogroll), am constantly adding new sites, and am quickly finding it to be an outstanding source of information.

Now if only I had picked a wittier name for my blog…

 

January 5th, 2007

New Attorney Advertising Rules (Is This Blog an Advertisement?)

New rules were announced in New York yesterday by the Office of Court Administration after months of debate regarding attorney advertising. The rules can be found here, courtesy of the New York State Bar Association. Two things of note, first on the reason for the rules and second on how they are applied.

The rule changes were prompted in part, I believe, by a number of attorneys rushing ads into the Staten Island Advance after the Staten Island Ferry disaster of October 2003, killing ten people.

Many ads appeared in the Advance the very next day, having been submitted the day of the accident before all the survivors had even been evacuated. It was not the finest hour of the New York bar.

The original rules suggested last year that there be a 30 day prohibition of such advertising for mass disaster. A problem with that was that the same rule didn’t apply to defense lawyers and their agents rushing in to try and settle cases before the injured had a chance to fairly evaluate their rights (or even to contemplate their future).

The new rules apply to all personal injury cases (not just mass disaster) and apply also to defense counsel. So if there must be change, at least now it won’t be to the detriment of those injured.

But this also leads to the second part, and that is defining attorney advertising. A web site clearly qualifies as an ad in the rules and must be so noted with the words “attorney advertising.” In fact, my own web site on personal injury law already has this comment in place:

This website is the firm’s electronic brochure, its sole form of attorney advertising. You found this site only because you looked for us. We do not engage in television, radio, print, mail or spam email advertising campaigns of any kind. Frankly, we find many of them somewhat offensive.

Throughout this site you will see examples of cases we have handled. Since all cases are different, and legal authority may change from year to year, it is important to remember that prior results cannot and do not guarantee or predict similar outcomes with respect to any future matter, including yours, in which any lawyer or law firm may be retained.

But what of web logs and their ever-changing content? If I link to my own web site, as I just did above, does this blog now become an advertisement? I also have this paragraph at my web site:

The Turkewitz Law Firm also sponsors the New York Personal Injury Law Blog to discuss issues of New York personal injury law, medical malpractice, cases of interest in the press, and public policy regarding the justice system. To the extent that it may discuss past cases the firm has handled for illustrative purposes, or in any way mentions the the firm or its services, the New York courts may deem this to be attorney advertising.

Will our web logs be considered advertising? Comments welcome on that one…

[Addendum: The front page article on attorney advertising in the New York Law Journal is now available at Law.com at this link.]