New York Personal Injury Law Blog » Attorney Ethics


November 19th, 2007

The Ethics of Attorney Search Services

The calls come to me virtually every week from some website that advertises for lawyers and then sells or in some manner refers the names to attorneys. These sites, generally, offer to send leads from a geographical area that are typed into their site to an attorney in exchange for some kind of payment. The websites act as an advertising front for the firms, without their names being exposed unless an inquiry is made. And so the issue is: What type of ethical responsibility does the lawyer have for the advertising conduct of the service?

Today I’ll name names for what appears to me to be clearly unethical conduct.

Here are a couple of the cold-call tactics used to sell the business to attorneys:

One call from started with this pitch, “I’m a representative of” Now even I know that this must be false. And so the question immediately arose: If the salesman will lie, what other kinds of ethical breaches will occur while your law firm name is attached to their website? (I decline to provide a link, as I don’t want to help them improve their pagerank with Google.)

An attorney in the Bronx I spoke with told me of a company called AnAttorneyForYou.Com that came at him with this pitch: They would take a percentage of the fee for sending personal injury matters to him. The lawyer I spoke with (who asked to remain anonymous) then asked if they were attorneys themselves, since a fee sharing arrangement with a non-attorney is a clear ethical breach. The answer was no, they were not attorneys, and that this was simply a fee for the referral. When the Bronx attorney asked about the ethics of splitting a fee with a non-attorney, the response was a version of, “I only work here.”

Indeed, their own Disclaimer states:

Nothing in this website is intended to imply that is a referral service certified by any state bar or bar association, or that satisfies the minimum standards for lawyer referral services established by any state bar or bar association

The implications of attorneys outsourcing advertising to a third party that may be acting unethically represents an area of law that is unexplored by many ethics committees. The company itself is most likely not in your state and not subject to attorney disciplinary rules. So what forces the advertising company that the lawyer is using to act in accordance with local ethics codes?

The very act of engaging such an advertising service should subject the law firm to disciplinary action for any ethical violations committed by the non-attorney advertising company. With this threat hanging over the head of an attorney, it is unlikely they would take such risks with their licenses. It thus makes it impossible to turn a blind eye to any ethical breaches by any service that is used as a front for the law firms.

There is little doubt that if and when attorneys are called on the carpet for problems, they will simply play dumb and say they didn’t know. But that should not be an acceptable excuse. And this is a problem that should be nipped in the bud quickly.

Links to this post:

adam winter and thomas dicicco: lying asshats of the day
today’s asshats of the day are adam winter and thomas a. dicicco, jr. of “web guardian” (i don’t know if it’s this webguardian, but it’s probably just a boiler room in boca raton). the first time adam called he gave his full name (”adam

posted by Mark Bennett @ July 10, 2009 3:48 PM

is sueeasy the worst lawyer idea ever?
cross posted from new york personal injury law blog: when i first heard about sueeasy, i thought it was an april fool’s joke. but it was october when it first appeared as a development concept (see 10/23/07 post: so how did you find
posted by Eric Turkewitz @ April 18, 2008 9:38 AM

4 thoughts on “The Ethics of Attorney Search Services

  1. The issue is whether or not the listing site is sharing revenue with the lawyers or not. If it is not sharing any revenue, or even better, if the listing is free, then there should be no ethical issue. In other words, advertising on a website, where the ad services is free, is ethical. Just as it is ethical to advertise on Google.

  2. The problem, as I see it, is that the attorney is unable to control the conduct of the listing service and the tactics it uses to drive people toward the site.

    With Google ads, the individual lawyer creates the copy of the ad.

    Even if the revenue issue is aboveboard, there may well be problems with the content of the ads. And if the agent (and I think that is what this may be, an agency) acts deceptively or unethically, the lawyer is in trouble.

  3. I can tell you this. I am a principal involved in one of the companies you mentioned. No one from my company has ever offered an attorney a fee-splitting arrangement. This whole story your getting from your friend in the Bronx sounds like some version of the telephone game. We do not and never have offered advertising programs that involved fee splitting. We understand the ethical issues involved in this type of advertising and do not want to be associated in any way shape or form with this accusation. I would appreciate your assistance in clearing up this matter. If one of the employees at our office made this call, I can guarantee you that this will not be tolerated. Although I am skeptical that an employee would have the intestinal fortitude and knowledge to ask for a fee-splitting arrangement but when asked if the employee knew if this was legal they turned into a coward and meekly replied “I just work here”
    I would appreciate your assistance in clearing up this issue. We have been providing advertising solutions for law firms around the country over the last 7 years and have never been associated with this type of behavior. I’m sure you can understand how this type of story would be detrimental to our business. Please feel free to contact me directly or have your friend contact me so that we can get to the bottom of this.

    Thank you in advance for your response.

  4. This whole story your getting from your friend in the Bronx sounds like some version of the telephone game.

    Perhaps that game of telephone, however, is taking place from the salesman’s end by not getting it right from his boss? Or from a salesman pushing the envelope to make a sale (even if the contract doesn’t do what the salesman’s initial pitch claimed)?

    Having listened to a hustle or two on the phone, such as the one that claimed, “I’m a representative of,” I do tend to be a bit cynical about these kinds of sales pitches.

    As to the attorney in the Bronx, I asked him multiple times to make sure I got his recitation correct.

    And with your comments, we now have the other side.